1 Our new Deepseek-based AI Says

Adelaide Tuckfield edited this page 2025-02-10 13:48:31 +07:00

Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can predict the future but at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to provide it its best shot. With approximately date news and a small however spirited 14 Billion criterion design, our AI is boldly anticipating the unpredictable. Join us as we attempt to address humanity's toughest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as 2 years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain numerous pressing concerns that are less easy to determine. Our company, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining concerns from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be much better at anticipating the future (and have seen some intriguing enhancements - research paper incoming). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can provide us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion specification design which is actually on the smaller side. (Some quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from many months ago so we have actually developed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unidentified area to make its finest prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We positioned the following concerns to our AI and gauged its reaction. While we have seen forecast enhancements from our training, use these price quotes for prop wagering at your own peril.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility

Therefore it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, but a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposition ...

First, I'll take a look at the crucial points from the posts. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been supportive of his career, attending his video games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even invited her loved ones to the Super Bowl, revealing her dedication.

Some fans are delighted, swwwwiki.coresv.net while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially provided remarks Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not dealing with the speculation straight.

I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential occasion, the odds and his actions suggest it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd estimate a low possibility, maybe around 5%, thinking about all elements.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the incredibly bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% chance

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" move, now its simply a different front-tush being pushed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's comparable efforts? Appears like our AI thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this game.

Alright, I'm attempting to determine the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I require to comprehend just what a "tush-push" is. From the articles, it appears like it's a strategy where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to press off defenders. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and strategy.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to execute the relocation. The short article mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this technique, which is pretty high. ... I likewise need to think of the defensive strategies of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" method, they might change their defense accordingly, which might either increase or decrease the number of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than five appears like a considerable number but possible given their self-confidence, I would estimate a possibility around 60-70% opportunity. This accounts for their preparation, confidence in the technique, and the probability that they'll utilize it a number of times, specifically if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime program performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% possibility

While our AI may not resemble us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, but in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to back down from a battle.

From the posts, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement throughout a previous halftime show when Trump existed in 2018. That seems substantial since it shows he's done it previously, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more current short articles, it discusses that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on personal expression. That could suggest he's less most likely to attend to Trump this time.

However, he's also associated with a feud with Drake, which might offer him reasons to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a disparagement fit from Drake, so maybe he bewares about consisting of any controversial songs in the performance. But given that he won the Grammys for that track, he might still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent event, Lamar might feel forced to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political declarations throughout the halftime program, so there's a threat that such content may be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making vibrant moves on big phases. He's the very first solo rap act to heading the halftime program, which might offer him more imaginative freedom. Plus, his previous behavior suggests he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public performances.

But I likewise keep in mind reading that Lamar expressed tiredness about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might show he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, particularly if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, present shifts in focus, legal issues, and the occasion's context-the probability appears to be moderately high, perhaps around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% chance

Lets be sincere, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the reality that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its prediction? Looks like theres rather of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't imply to cause offense and that he actually discovered it amusing himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which might suggest he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Taking a look at the short articles, it discusses that Andy Reid is a food lover and loves cheeseburgers. There's an article particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he's an individual who delights in consuming, particularly with his team. So, if there were plans to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would partake in a cheeseburger, particularly if the circumstance is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility

"Tails never fails?" You can't fool the devices !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been predicting the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be fooled and believes anything can happen when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to determine the possibility that the opening in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, however there's some historic data that might influence this forecast.

First, I go through the posts offered. They all discuss the historical stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has turned up more frequently than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the result 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a minor edge, however it's not a huge difference.

However, I keep in mind that the result of a coin toss is usually considered random. The small historical edge for tails might be due to possibility. But when making forecasts, often people weigh historical information even if it's not statistically significant. So, I should think about whether this historical predisposition should influence the probability.

After thinking of it, I decide that while the historic information reveals a slight choice for tails, it's not statistically substantial enough to move the possibility far from 0.5. So, I'll opt for 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the minor historical edge exists however doesn't bypass the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I promise we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would most likely think the same. BUT, its authorities now due to the fact that our AI states the possibilities are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still sort of high when it pertains to scams on a nationwide scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the possibility that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty serious allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of short articles that talk about conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some questionable contact current video games, specifically the AFC Championship Game. That does seem to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get annoyed when their team loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "absurd." They say there's no evidence of organized predisposition. That's a strong statement from the people in charge. If they're rejecting it, it may imply there's no genuine basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some truth to it.

Taking a look at the short articles, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise mentioned that analytical analysis does not show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have been penalized more because 2022. That's interesting due to the fact that if they were getting unique treatment, you might expect less charges, right?

...

So, putting everything together, the possibility that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably really low. Maybe not zero because you can't rule out every possibility, but extremely unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth enjoying the video game still? I think I'll need to wait and see how the video game ends up before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for an excellent video game! And hello, if it ends up our AI was incorrect about whatever, a minimum of it can gain from this.