From a6045da26c67bdbfd2b1b609c007b26318a276ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: brookmurtagh63 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 06:44:49 +0700 Subject: [PATCH] Add Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do --- ...what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md diff --git a/Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md b/Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..51c74f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +
MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: [Federal staff](https://findatradejob.com) members have until February 6 to decide whether to voluntarily leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday - that's less than a week from now - most will be permitted to take leave and be paid till the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work attorney who represents federal employees as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM's delayed resignation program would in fact mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I really do not consider it a lot an offer. I believe it's a request to resign with a vague guarantee that, potentially, you could be kept in administrative leave status for approximately 8 months - however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have been utilizing the term buyout to describe what this is because there appears to be the offer of administrative leave for up to 8 months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would absolutely not describe it as a buyout. I think that's a really misleading term to utilize in this situation. When you think about a buyout, there's usually some sort of written agreement or a concrete deal to offer a benefit in exchange for waiving particular rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your guidance, what are you telling them?BERCOVICI: [job](https://ura.cc/terrypye57) First thing we tell them is workout severe care. There are no guarantees included in this e-mail. The only thing I can tell you for specific is that if you change your mind, the firm's probably not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically providing up control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some classification of staff member who you think this might benefit? Maybe they're close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most careful due to the fact that leaving earlier than meant can have serious repercussions, [job](https://careers.cblsolutions.com/employer/profilsjob/) possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told reporters that this is a bargain for individuals who don't want to return to the office. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a tip to federal workers that they have to return in - to work. And if they don't, then they have the option to resign, and this administration is extremely generously offering to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You're shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply - in a manner, it breaks my heart that federal workers are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it's created to get folks who work truly hard to resign. I believe it's trying to pull the wool over a lot of individuals's eyes because there are no assurances. And these are individuals who enjoy their [job](https://tempjobsindia.in). They enjoy the objective of the agency. They strive. And today, they're [dealing](https://coverzen.co.zw) with really tough choices, especially if they're remote. I imply, it's extremely coercive.MARTIN: You say it's coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you're somebody who lives in Oregon and [job](https://morphomics.science/wiki/User:FelipeCani19) has been informed to report to D.C. or else we're going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you difficulties just to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, [job](https://pattern-wiki.win/wiki/User:KarissaZ04) to be sincere, [job](https://trademarketclassifieds.com/user/profile/2713497) is so extraordinary that I believe a great deal of us are still attempting to find out what to do with it. I'm uncertain if the offer itself might be challengeable. I believe the larger question is the execution of these terms. I'm not knowledgeable about any authority that exists today for OPM to purchase companies to give this variety of individuals administrative leave. So I believe it is quite possibly setting the phase for obstacles since I [feel OPM](https://www.informedica.llc) has actually greatly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.
+
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and [permissions](https://jobs.connect201.com) pages at www.npr.org for further details.
+
NPR records are produced on a rush due date by an NPR specialist. This text may not be in its final kind and might be updated or [job](https://jobstaffs.com/employer/apkjobs/) revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR's programs is the audio record.
\ No newline at end of file